Tag

legislation

Browsing

Editor’s Note: This article is part of In Public Safety’s October focus on domestic violence awareness

By Gary Minor, Faculty Member, Criminal Justice at American Military University

Beginning in the mid-1980s, states nationwide began changing domestic violence laws and the criminal justice community began treating domestic violence on the same level as violence involving strangers.

[Related Article: What Does Domestic Violence Look Like?]

Legislative changes were largely based on the results of the Minneapolis Domestic Violence Experiment (MDVE), which tested the impacts of mandatory arrests in cases involving intimate partners. The MDVE found that persons who were arrested were violent at a lower rate than those who were dealt with in other ways, thus this experiment led to the development of pro-arrest policies.

In passing such laws, the Washington Association of Sheriffs and Police Chiefs (WASPC) developed model operating procedures for law enforcement response to domestic violence and resource guidelines.

Part of this model policy is a list of questions for law enforcement officers to ask of potential victims and witnesses. When questioning the victim, first, the officer should focus on who, what, where, when, and how. This will develop probable cause for an arrest.

Here are some of the questions police should ask potential victims during a domestic violence call:

  1. Who called the police?
  2. Can you tell me why you called the police for help or why you think the police were called (if the caller was someone other than the victim)?
  3. Are you hurt?
  4. Are you feeling any soreness, tenderness, or pain anywhere on your body (visible or covered areas)?
  5. It looks like someone hit you; can you tell me what happened?
  6. Have you been struck, hit, or injured in some other way?
  7. Where on your body were you hit?
  8. Who hit you?
  9. What did this person hit you with?
  10. How were you hit? Was an object or weapon used (e.g. a shoe, a knife, a gun, a telephone, a fist)?
  11. Were you hit with an open or closed hand?
  12. Has this person ever hit or hurt you before?
  13. How many times were you hit?
  14. Has anything been broken or damaged (i.e. phone ripped out of the wall)?
  15. Has anything been thrown directly at you or near you?
  16. Are you pregnant?

The second set of questions focus on the victim’s fear. Officers need to determine how fearful the victim is of the abuser. The best way to determine this is to ask open-ended questions that allow the victim to talk at length about the incident. These answers will show the victim’s fear of the abuser and provide justification for that fear.

[Related: Traversing the Difficulties of Domestic Violence Calls]

In addition, responses can be the basis for a domestic violence protection order. These statements can also provide the judge with the authority to stop any visitation with children.

  1. What happened?
  2. What did you feel was going to happen?
  3. Describe how (abuser) was acting? What was said to you?
  4. What did (abuser) do or say to make you feel afraid?
  5. Were any threats made against you? Against your children or other family members? What were these threats?’
  6. What are your fears or concerns if the suspect is arrested? Have any statements or threats been made to you by the suspect when you have sought assistance?

These questions provide a two-fold approach to investigating domestic violence cases. In addition to providing the basic facts of the incident, responses also provide the police and courts objective reasoning behind the victim’s fear of the abuser.

Gary MinorAbout the Author: Gary Minor teaches criminal justice courses at American Military University. He completed his bachelor’s degree in Police Science and Administration with a minor in pre-law from Washington State University and his MBA in Information Systems at City University in Washington. After completing his MBA, he attended Seattle University School of Law and obtained his Juris Doctorate of law. He also obtained his police executive certification, a requirement to be a police chief executive of a law enforcement agency in Washington. His academic interests include police executive management, law and justice, juvenile justice and ethics in law enforcement. Professor Minor has significant executive experience, having served as a Chief of Police, President of the Snohomish County Police and Sheriff’s association and the South Snohomish County Police Advisory committee. He also served two terms as the Chairman of the Board for Emergency Services Coordinating Agency (ESCA), a FEMA affiliate.

 

The recent U. S. Supreme Court ruling legalizing same-sex marriage in all 50 states will affect many areas of society, including all segments of the criminal justice system. While the full impact of this ruling will take some time to sort out, there are several immediate issues facing criminal justice agencies. AMU professor Ron Wallace discusses some of the issues that criminal justice agencies must address in light of this new court ruling.

On May 21, the Restoring Education and Learning (REAL) Act was introduced to Congress that would allow state and federal prisoners to receive Pell Grants for a college education, even while incarcerated. There were many reasons why Congress banned Pell Grants to prisoners back in 1994, so why would Congress consider overturning its original decision? AMU professor Michael Pittaro writes about why he opposes this legislation and how there’s not enough research to demonstrate that higher education specifically reduces recidivism. If the Pell Grant program is to be extended, it should focus on providing more money to hard-working, law-abiding students.

Erin Merryn was a victim of child rape and sexual abuse. In an effort to help other child victims, she has dedicated her life to pushing states to adopt Erin’s Law, which requires schools to teach age-appropriate curriculum about sexual abuse to students in prekindergarten through fifth-grade. The purpose of this educational effort is to get victims to disclose abuse. Read more from AMU professor Michael Beshears about the progress of this law and why it has stalled in some state legislatures.

The Posse Comitatus Act of 1878 limits the use and participation of the military in policing the civilian population. As with any law, this act has both supporters and opponents. Those who support this legislation argue it’s essential in helping limit potential federal abuses of power. Opponents believe this act has fully outlived its usefulness in the post-9/11 world and should be abolished. Here’s why this act needs to be updated.