By Alex Horton and Michael Brice-Saddler
The Washington Post
John Walker Lindh’s eyes, dark and wild, were ubiquitous across magazine covers and cable news channels, alongside militants in Afghanistan, after he was captured in November 2001. He was a long-haired guerrilla with a California address — a traitor to some, a misguided kid sucked into Islamic jihad to others.
Dubbed the “American Taliban,” Lindh was sentenced to 20 years in prison after pleading guilty to supporting militants who harbored al-Qaeda as it planned the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001. But in a surprise move, Lindh will be released from federal prison on Thursday, three years early.
Lindh and other incarcerated American supporters of the Islamic State present a quandary with growing urgency: Is the United States prepared to try to rehabilitate extremists and foreign fighters, and welcome them back into society?
“There is very close to nothing in terms of de-radicalizing programs at the federal level,” said Bennett Clifford, a research fellow at George Washington University’s Program on Extremism. “The current model is hoping long prison sentences of material support of terrorism will be a deterrent.”
The Federal Bureau of Prisons is stymied by budget constraints, a sprawling corrections bureaucracy, and a top-down approach that focuses on traditional rehabilitation, such as turning away prisoners from gang activity or drugs, Clifford told The Washington Post.
About 500 federal prisoners been sentenced for terror-related crimes, and about a fifth will be released within five years — 62 of them are U.S. citizens, researcher Kevin D. Lowry wrote in the Journal for Deradicalization in 2018.
With Lindh’s release, and inmates with Islamic State ties nearing the end of their sentences, there may be a new focus on culling extremist beliefs before prisoners head back into civil society. But time is nearly up for many. “The offenders about to be released would receive resources at the end of their sentence,” Clifford said.
Federal officials have signaled interest in expanding recidivism-prevention and reintegration efforts, although it amounted to one paragraph in the White House’s 2018 counterterrorism strategy and focused on radicalization in prison.
There are some breakthroughs. U.S. District Court of Minnesota, which has had an influx of Islamic terrorism suspects, has pioneered efforts to focus deradicalization from extremist beliefs that includes civic education, family involvement and mental health counseling for inmates, Lowry wrote.
Those models were adapted from European programs and include efforts to combat white-supremacist beliefs. But there is no similar national program within federal prisons, Lowry noted.
Lindh’s early release is opposed by Sens. Richard C. Shelby (R-Ala.) and Maggie Hassan (D-N.H.), who requested in a Friday letter to the Federal Bureau of Prisons details about agency efforts to prevent recidivism from militants released from its facilities.
“We must consider the security and safety implications for our citizens and communities who will receive individuals like John Walker Lindh, who continue to openly call for extremist violence,” the letter reads.
Bill Cummings, an attorney for Lindh, did not return a request for comment.
The lawmakers asked for information about other convicted “terrorist offenders” who may be released from federal prison in coming years, and inquired about the steps prisons take to determine whether someone is an “ongoing public threat.”
Lindh, who was raised in California and Maryland, converted to Islam, met Osama bin Laden and joined the Taliban in Afghanistan before the Sept. 11 attacks, although his attorneys maintained that the attacks soured his outlook. They point to the dropping of terrorism charges as the government’s acknowledgment that he did not want to kill Americans. Lindh avoided a life sentence with that plea deal.
Last month, Shelby invoked the death of CIA officer Johnny Micheal “Mike” Spann, who interrogated Lindh at a prison in Mazar-e Sharif after his capture. Spann was shot and killed in a revolt by prisoners later that day, and Spann’s father has repeatedly accused Lindh of playing a role in his son’s death by not alerting Spann and others of the revolt.
“He’s as much responsible for Mike’s death as the people who beat him and shot him,” Johnny Spann told AL.com.
Hundreds of prisoners died in the days-long fight, and Lindh was one of the survivors.
In April, Shelby said President Trump agreed that Lindh should serve the remainder of his sentence. The White House did not return a request for comment Friday about the reported conversation and Trump’s thoughts about Lindh’s imminent release.
Lindh remains in custody at the Terre Haute Federal Correctional Institution in Indiana. The Bureau of Prisons did not return a request for comment, and an explanation for his early release was not available. Credits for good behavior can reduce an inmate’s sentence by up to 15 percent, which in Lindh’s case, would amount to three years.
Federal probation officials requested numerous conditions for Lindh’s release, according to court filings. He will need permission to acquire Internet-capable devices, which would be monitored “continuously.” Lindh was ordered to undergo mental health counseling, and will not be allowed to communicate online in any language other than English without approval.
He is also barred from having a passport, communicating with known extremists or accessing material that reflects “extremist or terroristic views,” according to the documents. Lindh initially objected to those conditions but agreed to comply in late March after consulting with an attorney.
Most of those conditions are routine, Clifford said, although the language restriction appeared unusual for felons such as Lindh.
Lindh has expressed remorse for his crimes. He tearfully told the judge during his 2002 sentencing: “I have never supported terrorism in any form, and I never will. . . . I made a mistake by joining the Taliban,” he said at the time. “Had I realized then what I know now, I would never have joined them.”
In 2017, an investigation by Foreign Policy magazine painted a different picture. It cited documents obtained that year from the National Counterterrorism Center, which said that as of May 2016, Lindh “continued to advocate for global jihad and to write and translate violent extremist texts.” The center also wrote that Lindh “told a television news producer that he would continue to spread violent extremist Islam upon his release.”
The report, which Shelby and Hassan cited in their letter, notes that there is no record of Lindh participating in media interviews.
In the documents, the National Counterterrorism Center said “homegrown violent extremists” like Lindh were likely to “reengage in terrorist activity” after being released from prison — an assertion that Clifford doubts.
“There is not much data of recidivism [of terror suspects] in the United States because it’s a new problem,” he said.
Joshua Dratel, a lawyer who has defended suspected and convicted terrorists, told The Post that Shelby and Hassan were overreacting to Lindh’s early release. He called their letter “a solution in search of a problem” and likened it to fearmongering.
“Beyond John Walker Lindh, anyone whose offense involved actual violence is not getting out soon,” Dratel said. “In a certain sense, saying, ‘Dangerous terrorists are going to be out there’ is not true. These people were sentenced accordingly by judges.”
Tom Jackman and Felicia Sonmez contributed to this report.
‘I get the same intel:’ Iran threat exaggerated by GOP hawks, Rep. Gallego says
Trump administration tells judge Congress did not deny border wall funds when it declined to appropriate money for it
This article was written by Alex Horton and Michael Brice-Saddler from The Washington Post and was legally licensed through the NewsCred publisher network. Please direct all licensing questions to firstname.lastname@example.org.