By Dr. Shana Nicholson and Joseph Heaton
As emergency medical services (EMS) managers, quality assurance (QA) can be a struggle when it comes to guiding our staff. It is imperative that we ensure staff is not only treating patients appropriately, but that we document this care within the appropriate guidelines and medical protocols. However, as we know, this effort can be a struggle.
Many times when we discuss the QA process of medical care review with emergency medical providers, the initial response is to become defensive or aggravated. Historically, the QA system has been used as a weapon in a sort of blame game for problems with a call. EMS providers have been judged by peers and medical directors as lacking in professionalism, skills, and providing bad patient care on an opinion-based system. However, there has been a shift in federal patient care guidelines toward the Quality Improvement (QI) method of review.
Medical professionals are transitioning to a QI for peer review of patient care records. The QI process of chart review looks for performance deficits over multiple care scenarios. The QI process sees a standardized level of care and utilizes a fair approach to evaluating the needs of the agency’s emergency providers. The QI process allows for self-reporting and sampling of run sheets. Data capture focuses on multiple areas of the run report for sampling as well. As the patient care sheets are evaluated, learning opportunities for the providers are identified as areas of improvement.
What Does the QI Process Focus On?
Good patient care can be established and maintained through an understanding of evidence-based practice, regulatory guidelines, and a standard of practice that must be followed. In order to ensure that each of these standards are met, we must self-assess our skills and the skills of the agency. We must assess the evidence-based practice and identify the risks in our practice. There should be an ongoing assessment of current practices within our field personnel to identify gaps in communication, knowledge, skills, and workflow. These gaps must be identified and improved upon.
The ultimate goal of any QI program is to improve patient care. Therefore, we can utilize a QI program to improve skills and mentor EMS personnel with potential weaknesses. For organizations that support quality assurance programs, there is a decrease in cost resulting from improved efficiency as well.
The QI approach encourages EMS providers to do the right skills well. QI programs may improve provider morale as a result of participation in the move toward excellence, and pride in workmanship. One survey found an improved sense of teamwork after initiating these programs. Patients must receive quality emergency medical care from the moment they enter the health care system.
Leadership by the medical community is crucial if this goal is to be realized. It is important to focus on improving skills and mentorship of EMS personnel. As a QI program improves provider results, management can further support their staff by sharing these improvements and achievements in staff meetings, with awards, and even with simple acknowledgments.
EMS as a profession does not embrace change well, especially in comparison to other medical fields, but through the QI approach, we as EMS managers can encourage EMS providers to do the right things and do them well.


Comments are closed.